FOS decisions / Savings Account
Savings Account
Financial Ombudsman Service final decisions, reproduced verbatim from the FOS published decisions register.
Decisions
41
Upheld
21
Not upheld
20
Avg redress
£2,075
Upheld complaints (21)
Starling Bank Limited
DRN-6218043A bank may reasonably hold large payments for security verification purposes, and customers should familiarize themselves with payment policies before initiating transfers.
UpheldRedress £150Decision DRN-6194711
A business is responsible for compensating consumers fairly for the direct consequences of its errors, but not for consequences that would have occurred regardless of the error.
UpheldRedress £300Decision DRN-6276405
A lender must provide clear advice about offset mortgage arrangements and ensure customers understand how linked accounts interact to reduce interest charges.
UpheldFirst Central Insurance Management Limited
DRN-6241865A financial services provider must refund cancelled policy premiums to the card last used for payment, not an outdated card, and must ensure clear communication about refund procedures.
UpheldRedress £100Barclays Bank UK PLC
DRN-6033588Banks have the right to close customer accounts in accordance with their terms and conditions, though they must do so fairly without unreasonable lack of notice.
UpheldRedress £150Decision DRN-6163399
A financial services provider must consider reasonable adjustments and vulnerable customer support rather than rigidly requiring Power of Attorney or medical confirmation as the only options for third-party account management.
UpheldRedress £275J.P. Morgan Europe Limited
DRN-6276547Financial institutions must identify and protect vulnerable customers from foreseeable and avoidable harm, in accordance with the FCA Consumer Duty.
UpheldRedress £100Monzo Bank Limited
DRN-6240152Banks must return fraudulently-obtained funds to their true owners even if the recipient account holder claims legitimate entitlement, provided the bank follows proper procedures.
UpheldRedress £100Decision DRN-6197878
A bank may reasonably rely on a declarant's statement of parental responsibility if it has conducted required identity and address document checks, even if the declaration is subsequently found to be false.
UpheldDecision DRN-6280979
A financial institution cannot hold a customer jointly liable for a loan agreement they did not sign or consent to, regardless of whether they subsequently benefited from funds.
UpheldAllica Bank Limited
DRN-6122187Financial institutions must comply with regulatory obligations to establish the purpose and origin of funds, which override other obligations and justify account closure if source of funds cannot be verified.
UpheldRedress £3,535HSBC UK Bank
DRN-6032043A financial institution must not unilaterally recall funds without the consumer's knowledge or consent, particularly where doing so causes direct financial detriment.
UpheldRedress £100Charter Court Financial Services Limited
DRN-6268254A financial institution must provide complete and clear information about its processes upfront, particularly regarding security verification procedures that may delay customer transactions.
UpheldRedress £200Investec Bank PLC
DRN-6060031A financial institution must take reasonable steps to ensure accounts held under a deputyship order are properly registered and maintained under that authority when transferring between platforms or opening new accounts.
UpheldPhoenix Life Limited
DRN-6120926A firm must handle withdrawal requests promptly and accurately, and must pay fair compensation for distress and inconvenience caused by errors, assessed based on the actual impact on the consumer.
UpheldRedress £400THE CO-OPERATIVE BANK P.L.C
DRN-6237386A business is entitled to set its own interest rates, and the FCA's Consumer Duty does not require businesses to offer competitive or market-leading rates, only to assess fair value.
UpheldRedress £25The Royal Bank of Scotland Plc
DRN-6185885A firm has discretion to vary variable-rate savings accounts and is not obliged to increase rates in line with base rate increases or to notify customers of new product issues with higher rates.
UpheldNational Savings and Investments
DRN-6253751NS&I's rejection of an application with a PO Box address was procedurally justified, and compensation should aim to restore the consumer to their position had the bonds been purchased as intended, limited to actual losses.
UpheldRedress £350Clydesdale Bank Plc trading as Virgin Money
DRN-6220361A financial institution must provide reasonable assistance to customers with medical conditions who request help in switching to higher-yielding accounts, particularly when the customer has explicitly stated their difficulty in managing suc
UpheldRedress £596Barclays Bank UK PLC
DRN-6132253A bank must provide reasonable notice before closing a customer's account, and immediately closing an ISA account without notice prevents the customer from using formal transfer procedures.
UpheldMetro Bank Plc
DRN-5965004A financial institution must provide clear, unambiguous information about whether an interest rate is fixed or variable, and must not give misleading assurances that contradict the terms and conditions.
UpheldRedress £150
Not-upheld complaints (20)
Investec Bank PLC
DRN-6236422Financial institutions may decline account applications where verification checks fail, provided they apply their verification processes consistently and without discrimination.
Not upheldApr 2026Decision DRN-6075442
Financial businesses are entitled to set reasonable conditions for promotional offers, and different customer groups may receive different outcomes provided fair value is maintained.
Not upheldDec 2025Wise Payments Limited
DRN-6295627A payment service provider is not required to prevent a scam loss if further enquiries would not have been likely to uncover the fraud, even if the provider should have intervened.
Not upheldRevolut Ltd
DRN-6256008A regulated payment services provider is not liable for losses from investment scams where the consumer, despite appropriate warnings and interventions, insists on proceeding with transactions after being advised of the scam risk.
Not upheldDecision DRN-5781687
A financial institution is not liable for losses that occur after funds are safely received into a customer's account and are subsequently taken by a scammer at another institution.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6201370
A firm must act with skill, care and diligence, communicate clearly and fairly, and act in the best interests of its clients when processing investment applications and communicating with customers.
Not upheldBarclays Bank UK PLC
DRN-6247057Banks should intervene to prevent payments when there are unusual transaction patterns indicative of scams, but are only liable for losses if an appropriate intervention would likely have stopped the scam.
Not upheldHSBC UK Bank
DRN-6265533Lenders must accurately report arrears and defaults to Credit Reference Agencies when contractual repayments are missed, even during hardship arrangements, as other lenders rely on this information for credit decisions.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6108187
A lender is not party to an unfair credit relationship under Section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 merely because a supplier may have breached timeshare marketing regulations, absent evidence that the credit relationship itself was r
Not upheldLloyds Bank PLC
DRN-6303875A bank is not liable for authorised payments made by a customer unless there is clear evidence of a scam and the bank failed to take reasonable protective measures despite identifying suspicious indicators.
Not upheldBarclays Bank UK PLC
DRN-6181639A lender's affordability checks must be reasonable and proportionate to the credit being offered, and a lender is not required to conduct intrusive investigations where available information suggests the borrower can afford repayments.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6176061
A firm must pay compensation only if its delay in processing pension benefits caused the consumer financial loss; delays caused by regulatory compliance steps and market movements must be considered.
Not upheldDecision DRN-6266131
Banks are not generally expected to routinely monitor accounts for signs of harmful behaviour without prior awareness of customer vulnerabilities or clear indicators of fraud.
Not upheldCoventry Building Society
DRN-6224449A financial institution is not at fault when it cannot locate an account due to the customer providing incorrect account numbers or when account profiles are created separately due to address discrepancies in online applications.
Not upheldRevolut Ltd
DRN-5876292A bank is not automatically liable for losses from scams simply because a scam occurred; liability depends on whether the bank reasonably ought to have prevented the payments or hindered recovery.
Not upheldBank of Scotland plc
DRN-6189151Banks are entitled to set their own savings account interest rates and are not required to offer the best market rate or recommend alternative products for non-advised savings accounts, provided they communicate rates clearly to customers.
Not upheldShawbrook Bank Limited
DRN-6173833A variable rate savings account does not obligate the provider to vary rates at any particular time or for any specific reason, provided the terms and conditions clearly disclose this discretion.
Not upheldParagon Bank Plc
DRN-5465297A bank should provide fair redress for service failures, but is not obliged to provide compensation beyond what reasonably reflects the actual losses and inconvenience caused.
Not upheldAtom Bank PLC
DRN-6174779Banks operating app-only systems can require biometric re-registration on new devices and are not obliged to provide exceptions, provided reasonable alternatives to account access are offered.
Not upheldSantander UK Plc
DRN-6173692A bank may transfer a fixed-term savings account to a different product at maturity in accordance with the terms and conditions disclosed at opening, provided clear notice is given.
Not upheld